Comparison of semiquantitative and differential time to positivity methods for the diagnosis of central line-associated bloodstream infections in an intensive care unit

References

1. Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Mimoz O. Prevention of central venous catheter-related infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care 2010; 14:212 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Timsit JF, Rupp M, Bouza E, Chopra V, Kärpänen T et al. A state of the art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 2018; 44:742–759 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Horan TC, Gaynes RP. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. Appendix A-1: CDC definitions of nosocomial infections. In Mayhall CG. editor Hospital Epidemiology an Infection Control, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins; 2004 pp 1659–1702
   [Google Scholar]
4. Siempos II, Kopterides P, Tsangaris I, Dimopoulou I, Armaganidis AE. Impact of catheter-related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2283–2289 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Nuckols TK, Keeler E, Morton SC, Anderson L, Doyle B et al. Economic evaluation of quality improvement interventions for bloodstream infections related to central catheters: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:1843–1854 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Lucet JC, Bouadma L, Zahar JR, Schwebel C, Geffroy A et al. Infectious risk associated with arterial catheters compared with central venous catheters. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1030–1035 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brun-Buisson C. Suspected central venous catheter-associated infection: can the catheter be safely retained?. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:1005–1007 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Mermel LA, Allon M, Bouza E, Craven DE, Flynn P et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 update by the infectious diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:1–45 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Catton JA, Dobbins BM, Kite P, Wood JM, Eastwood K et al. In situ diagnosis of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparison of quantitative culture, differential time to positivity, and endoluminal brushing. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:787–791 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:1305–1309 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement M100–S24. USA: CLSI, Wayne, PA; 2014
    [Google Scholar]
12. Blot F, Nitenberg G, Chachaty E, Raynard B, Germann N et al. Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures. Lancet 1999; 354:1071–1077 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Šimundić AM. Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions. EJIFCC 2009; 19:203–211
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcalá L, Pérez MJ, Rincón C et al. A randomized and prospective study of 3 procedures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter withdrawal. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:820–826 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Freire MP, Pierrotti LC, Zerati AE, Benites L, da Motta-Leal Filho JM et al. Role of lock therapy for long-term catheter-related infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gowardman JR, Jeffries P, Lassig-Smith M, Stuart J, Jarrett P et al. A comparative assessment of two conservative methods for the diagnosis of catheter-related infection in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:109–116 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Rijnders BJ, Verwaest C, Peetermans WE, Wilmer A, Vandecasteele S et al. Difference in time to positivity of hub-blood versus nonhub-blood cultures is not useful for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2001; 29:1399–1403 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bouza E, Alvarado N, Alcalá L, Sánchez-Conde M, Pérez MJ et al. A prospective, randomized, and comparative study of 3 different methods for the diagnosis of intravascular catheter colonization. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 40:1096–1100 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Safdar N, Fine JP, Maki DG. Meta-analysis: methods for diagnosing intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:451–466 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]