1887

Microbiology Society logo

Volume 170, Issue 3

Genetic modification of , a non-pathogenic CTG species, reveals function Open Access

Abstract

is closely related to important pathogenic species, especially and but it has been rarely isolated from humans. For this reason, through comparative studies, it could be a powerful model to understand the genetic underpinnings of the pathogenicity of species. Here, we generated a cohesive assembly of the genome and developed genetic engineering tools that will facilitate studying this species at a molecular level. We used a combination of short and long-read sequencing to build a polished genomic draft composed of 14 Mbp, 45 contigs and close to 5700 genes. This assembly represents a substantial improvement from the currently available sequences that are composed of thousands of contigs. Genomic comparison with and revealed a substantial reduction in the total number of genes in . However, gene loss seems not to be associated to the avirulence of this species given that most genes that have been previously associated with pathogenicity were also present in . To be able to edit the genome of we generated a set of triple auxotrophic strains so that gene deletions can be performed similarly to what has been routinely done in pathogenic species. As a proof of concept, we generated gene knockouts of a gene that encodes a transcription factor that is essential for filamentation and biofilm formation in and . Characterization of these mutants showed that Efg1 also plays a role in biofilm formation and filamentous growth in , but it seems to be a repressor of filamentation in this species. The genome assembly and auxotrophic mutants developed here are a key step forward to start using for comparative and evolutionary studies at a molecular level.

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Candida maltosa , CTG clade , CUG-Ser1 yeasts , EFG1 , non-pathogenic Candida and pathogenic yeasts
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (Award 2019-000037-02NACF-26396)
    • Principle Award Recipient: MarcoChávez-Tinoco
  • Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (Award 4133922)
    • Principle Award Recipient: LuisF. García-Ortega
  • Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (Award FORDECYT-PRONACES/103000/2020)
    • Principle Award Recipient: EugenioMancera
© 2024 The Authors
  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. This article was made open access via a Publish and Read agreement between the Microbiology Society and the corresponding author’s institution.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001447
2024-03-08
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/170/3/mic001447.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001447&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Krassowski T, Coughlan AY, Shen XX, Zhou X, Kominek J et al. Evolutionary instability of CUG-Leu in the genetic code of budding yeasts. Nat Commun 2018; 9:1887 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, Santos MAS, Sakthikumar S et al. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 2009; 459:657–662 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Jackson AP, Gamble JA, Yeomans T, Moran GP, Saunders D et al. Comparative genomics of the fungal pathogens Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans. Genome Res 2009; 19:2231–2244 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bongomin F, Gago S, Oladele RO, Denning DW. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J Fungi 2017; 3:57 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Parums DV. The World Health Organization (WHO) fungal priority pathogens list in response to emerging fungal pathogens during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e939088 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Maciel NOP, Piló FB, Freitas LFD, Gomes FCO, Johann S et al. The diversity and antifungal susceptibility of the yeasts isolated from coconut water and reconstituted fruit juices in Brazil. Int J Food Microbiol 2013; 160:201–205 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Mauersberger S, Ohkuma M, Schunck W. Candida maltosa. In Nonconventional Yeasts in Biotechnology 1996 pp 412–580 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Vadkertiová R, Sláviková E. Metal tolerance of yeasts isolated from water, soil and plant environments. J Basic Microbiol 2006; 46:145–152 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhai YC, Huang LN, Xi ZW, Chai CY, Hui FL. Candida yunnanensis sp. nov. and Candida parablackwelliae sp. nov., two yeast species in the Candida albicans/Lodderomyces clade. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2775–2780 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gabaldón T, Naranjo-Ortíz MA, Marcet-Houben M. Evolutionary genomics of yeast pathogens in the Saccharomycotina. FEMS Yeast Res 2016; 16:fow064 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Schikora-Tamarit MÀ, Gabaldón T. Using genomics to understand the mechanisms of virulence and drug resistance in fungal pathogens. Biochem Soc Trans 2022; 50:1259–1268 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Muñoz JF, Gade L, Chow NA, Loparev VN, Juieng P et al. Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5346 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Flanagan PR, Fletcher J, Boyle H, Sulea R, Moran GP et al. Expansion of the TLO gene family enhances the virulence of Candida species. PLoS ONE 2018; 13:e0200852 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Moran GP, Coleman DC, Sullivan DJ. Candida albicans versus Candida dubliniensis: why is C. albicans more pathogenic?. Int J Microbiol 2012205921 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner SA, Butler G. The Candida pathogenic species complex. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2014; 4:a019778 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Komagata K, Katsuya N. Assimilation of hydrocarbons by yeasts II. determination of hydrocarbon-assimilating yeasts. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1964; 10: [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu N-N, Zhao X, Tan J-C, Liu S, Li B-W et al. Mycobiome dysbiosis in women with intrauterine adhesions. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0132422 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gacho C, Coronado F, Tansengco M, Barcelo J, Borromeo C et al. Isolation, identification and heavy metal biosorption assessment of yeast isolates indigenous to abandoned mine sites of Itogon Benguet, Philippines. JESAM 2019; 22:109–121 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. El-Latif Hesham A, Gupta VK, Singh BP. Use of PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for the discrimination of Candida species isolated from natural habitats. Microb Pathog 2018; 120:19–22 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Kawai S, Hikiji T, Murao S, Takagi M, Yano K. Isolation and sequencing of a gene, C-ADE1, and its use for a host-vector system in Candida maltosa with two genetic markers. Agric Biol Chem 1991; 55:59–65 [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gradova NB, Kovalskii IU. Production of fodder yeast cultures on media containing hydrocarbons (Russ) google Académico. Mikrobiologiia 1978; 47:259–264
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Becher D, Schulze S, Kasüske A, Schulze H, Samsonova IA et al. Molecular analysis of a leu2-mutant of Candida maltosa demonstrates the presence of multiple alleles. Curr Genet 1994; 26:208–216 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Nakazawa T, Motoyama T, Horiuchi H, Ohta A, Takagi M. Evidence that part of a centromeric DNA region induces pseudohyphal growth in a dimorphic yeast, Candida maltosa. J Bacteriol 1997; 179:5030–5036 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Takaku H, Mutoh E, Horiuchi H, Ohta A, Takagi M. Ray38p, a homolog of a purine motif triple-helical DNA-binding protein, Stm1p, is a ribosome-associated protein and dissociated from ribosomes prior to the induction of cycloheximide resistance in Candida maltosa. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 284:194–202 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Ake AHJ, Hafidi M, Ouhdouch Y, Jemo M, Aziz S et al. Microorganisms from tannery wastewater: isolation and screening for potential chromium removal. Envir Technol Inn 2023; 31:103167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Defosse TA, Le Govic Y, Courdavault V, Clastre M, Vandeputte P et al. Yeasts from the CTG clade (Candida clade): biology, impact in human health, and biotechnological applications. J Mycol Med 2018; 28:257–268 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lin Y, He P, Wang Q, Lu D, Li Z et al. The alcohol dehydrogenase system in the xylose-fermenting yeast Candida maltosa. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e11752 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Wick R, Menzel P. Filtlong: quality filtering tool for long reads; 2009 https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Wick%2C+R.%2C+%26+Menzel%2C+P.+%282019%29.+Filtlong%3A+quality+filtering+tool+for+long+reads
  29. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 2018; 34:i884–i890 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 2017; 27:722–736 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 2014; 9:e112963 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3210–3212 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Smit A, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker 4.0; 2013 http://www.repeatmasker.org/RMDownload.html
  34. Campbell MS, Holt C, Moore B, Yandell M. Genome annotation and curation using MAKER and MAKER-P. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2014; 48:4 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Korf I. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5:1–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S et al. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:W435–9 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1236–1240 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Paril J, Zare T, Fournier-Level A. Compare_genomes: a comparative genomics workflow to streamline the analysis of evolutionary divergence across eukaryotic genomes. Curr Protoc 2023; 3:e876 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol 2019; 20:238 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mistry J, Finn RD, Eddy SR, Bateman A, Punta M. Challenges in homology search: HMMER3 and convergent evolution of coiled-coil regions. Nucleic Acids Res 2013; 41:e121 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Thomas PD, Ebert D, Muruganujan A, Mushayahama T, Albou L-P et al. PANTHER: making genome-scale phylogenetics accessible to all. Protein Sci 2022; 31:8–22 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  42. De Bie T, Cristianini N, Demuth JP, Hahn MW. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:1269–1271 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004; 5:113 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:1972–1973 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Miller MA, Schwartz T, Hoover P, Yoshimoto K, Sivagnanam S et al. The CIPRES workbench: a flexible framework for creating science gateways. ACM Int Con Proc Series 2015 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang Y, Tang H, Debarry JD, Tan X, Li J et al. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:2–14 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Carlson M, Herves P. AnnotationForge: Tools for building SQLite-based annotation data packages DOI: 10.18129/B9.bioc.AnnotationForge R package version 1.44.0,. Bioconductor Package Maintainer; 2023 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/AnnotationForge.html
  48. Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 2012; 16:284–287 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gómez-Gaviria M, Martínez-Álvarez JA, Chávez-Santiago JO, Mora-Montes HM. Candida haemulonii complex and Candida auris: biology, virulence factors, immune response, and multidrug resistance. Infect Drug Resist 2023; 16:1455–1470 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Noble SM, French S, Kohn LA, Chen V, Johnson AD. Systematic screens of a Candida albicans homozygous deletion library decouple morphogenetic switching and pathogenicity. Nat Genet 2010; 42:590–598 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Oh S-H, Smith B, Miller AN, Staker B, Fields C et al. Agglutinin-Like Sequence (ALS) genes in the Candida parapsilosis species complex: blurring the boundaries between gene families that encode cell-wall proteins. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:781 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Zhang Z, Carriero N, Zheng D, Karro J, Harrison PM et al. PseudoPipe: an automated pseudogene identification pipeline. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:1437–1439 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mancera E, Frazer C, Porman AM, Ruiz-Castro S, Johnson AD et al. Genetic modification of closely related Candida species. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:357 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Noble SM, Johnson AD. Strains and strategies for large-scale gene deletion studies of the diploid human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 2005; 4:298–309 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lackey E, Vipulanandan G, Childers DS, Kadosh D. Comparative evolution of morphological regulatory functions in Candida species. Eukaryot Cell 2013; 12:1356–1368 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Lee KL, Buckley HR, Campbell CC. An amino acid liquid synthetic medium for the development of mycelial and yeast forms of Candida albicans. Sabouraudia 1975; 13:148–153 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang Q, Tao L, Guan G, Yue H, Liang W et al. Regulation of filamentation in the human fungal pathogen Candida tropicalis. Mol Microbiol 2016; 99:528–545 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Naseem S, Douglas LM, Konopka JB. Candida albicans agar invasion assays. Bio-Protocol 2020; 10:16 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Mancera E, Porman AM, Cuomo CA, Bennett RJ, Johnson AD. Finding a missing gene: EFG1 regulates morphogenesis in Candida tropicalis. G3 2015; 5:849–856 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Ramos L, Borghi A, Ramadán S, Lopez C. The use of calcofluor white for the detection of fungi which cause subcutaneous and systemic mycoses. Bol Micol 1999; 14:9 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Mancera E, Nocedal I, Hammel S, Gulati M, Mitchell KF et al. Evolution of the complex transcription network controlling biofilm formation in Candida species. Elife 2021; 10:e64682 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Nobile CJ, Fox EP, Nett JE, Sorrells TR, Mitrovich QM et al. A recently evolved transcriptional network controls biofilm development in Candida albicans. Cell 2012; 148:126–138 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Gupta V, Abhisheik K, Balasundari S, Devendra NK, Shadab K et al. Identification of Candida albicans using different culture media and its association in leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019; 23:28–35 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Takagi M, Yano K. Separation of chromosomal DNA molecules of Candida maltosa on agarose gels using the OFAGE technique. Agri Biol Chem 1987; 51:3161–3163 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Mba IE, Nweze EI, Eze EA, Anyaegbunam ZKG. Genome plasticity in Candida albicans: a cutting-edge strategy for evolution, adaptation, and survival. Infect Genet Evol 2022; 99:105256 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Xu J. Is natural population of Candida tropicalis sexual, parasexual, and/or asexual?. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2021; 11:751676 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Guin K, Chen Y, Mishra R, Muzaki SRB, Thimmappa BC et al. Spatial inter-centromeric interactions facilitated the emergence of evolutionary new centromeres. Elife 2020; 9:e58556 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Mishra PK, Baum M, Carbon J. Centromere size and position in Candida albicans are evolutionarily conserved independent of DNA sequence heterogeneity. Mol Genet Genomics 2007; 278:455–465 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Proux-Wéra E, Armisén D, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. A pipeline for automated annotation of yeast genome sequences by a conserved-synteny approach. BMC Bioinformatics 2012; 13:1–12 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Haran J, Boyle H, Hokamp K, Yeomans T, Liu Z et al. Telomeric ORFs (TLOs) in Candida spp. Encode mediator subunits that regulate distinct virulence traits. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004658 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Oh S-H, Isenhower A, Rodriguez-Bobadilla R, Smith B, Jones J et al. Pursuing advances in DNA sequencing technology to solve a complex genomic jigsaw puzzle: the agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) genes of Candida tropicalis. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:594531 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Parra-Ortega B, Cruz-Torres H, Villa-Tanaca L, Hernández-Rodríguez C. Phylogeny and evolution of the aspartyl protease family from clinically relevant Candida species. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2009; 104:505–512 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Taylor BN, Staib P, Binder A, Biesemeier A, Sehnal M et al. Profile of Candida albicans-secreted aspartic proteinase elicited during vaginal infection. Infect Immun 2005; 73:1828–1835 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Holland LM, Schröder MS, Turner SA, Taff H, Andes D et al. Comparative phenotypic analysis of the major fungal pathogens Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 2014; 10:e1004365 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Nguyen N, Quail MMF, Hernday AD. An efficient, rapid, and recyclable system for CRISPR-mediated genome editing in Candida albicans. mSphere 2017; 2:e00149-17 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Hirakawa MP, Martinez DA, Sakthikumar S, Anderson MZ, Berlin A et al. Genetic and phenotypic intra-species variation in Candida albicans. Genome Res 2015; 25:413–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Montelongo-Jauregui D, Saville SP, Lopez-Ribot JL. Contributions of Candida albicans dimorphism, adhesive interactions, and extracellular matrix to the formation of dual-species biofilms with Streptococcus gordonii. mBio 2019; 10:e01179-19 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Ramage G, VandeWalle K. The filamentation pathway controlled by the Efg1 regulator protein is required for normal biofilm formation and development in Candida albicans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002; 214:95–100 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sonneborn A, Bockmühl DP, Ernst JF. Chlamydospore formation in Candida albicans requires the Efg1p morphogenetic regulator. Infect Immun 1999; 67:5514–5517 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Takaku H, Horiuchi H, Takagi M, Ohta A. Pseudohyphal growth in a dimorphic yeast, Candida maltosa, after disruption of the C-GCN4 gene, a homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae GCN4. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2002; 66:1936–1939 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Ramírez-Ramírez R, Calvo-Méndez C, Avila-Rodríguez M, Lappe P, Ulloa M et al. Cr(VI) reduction in a chromate-resistant strain of Candida maltosa isolated from the leather industry. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2004; 85:63–68 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Connolly LA, Riccombeni A, Grózer Z, Holland LM, Lynch DB et al. The APSES transcription factor Efg1 is a global regulator that controls morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida parapsilosis. Mol Microbiol 2013; 90:36–53 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Robinson D, Vanacloig-Pedros E, Cai R, Place M, Hose J et al. Gene-by-environment interactions influence the fitness cost of gene copy-number variation in yeast. G3 2023; 13:jkad159 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Steenwyk JL, Rokas A. Copy number variation in fungi and its implications for wine yeast genetic diversity and adaptation. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:288 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Kiss RD, Stephanopoulos G. Culture instability of auxotrophic amino acid producers. Biotechnol Bioeng 1992; 40:75–85 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Huang MY, Woolford CA, May G, McManus CJ, Mitchell AP. Circuit diversification in a biofilm regulatory network. PLoS Pathog 2019; 15:e1007787 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001447
Loading
Genetic modification of Candida maltosa, a non-pathogenic CTG species, reveals EFG1 function
Microbiology 170, 001447 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.001447
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001447
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.001447
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

EXCEL

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error